-
-
For one thing, the analysis didn't adjust for a few confounders that could be important: - maternal age - paternal factors - BMI/blood sugar/blood pressure (they did adjust for ICD-10 codes but these are pretty blunt)
Show this thread -
Now all of this is not to say that this study isn't worthwhile, important, and should prompt further research But I think it's worth noting that the CNN headline at the start of this thread that went mega-viral is misleading at best
Show this thread -
If NOTHING ELSE, this could read "0.3% more likely to die"pic.twitter.com/s8VnrO4Ipq
Show this thread -
Anyway, the point here is not to bash the study, but to point out that you should be skeptical of everything ESPECIALLY if it agrees with you because that's where you're most blind
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.