I disagree with this take. Part of the problem is that the issue is complex, and it's very difficult/impossible to distinguish different ways the disease spreads in close contact As with most of epi, it depends!https://twitter.com/apoorva_nyc/status/1294766426062979074 …
-
-
Maybe not everybody? See: https://twitter.com/jljcolorado/status/1289721055901147139?s=19 … Trying to convince others, some success, some failure at that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't that what Raina McIntyre and co are arguing here? That it is airborne and means changes for health care worker protection amongst other things?https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/current-guidelines-respiratory-protection-australian-health-care-workers-against-covid …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be unethical to investigate exactly what size of droplet/aerosol, what distance, what amount and what time. Calling it airborne and acting like it would mean superspread in churches, bars, hospitals etc can be acted against. Which makes it useful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
