The Mayo Clinic convalescent plasma for COVID-19 study is such a depressing waste of time it is frightening After treating THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND patients, we still have no idea if the treatment workshttps://www.statnews.com/2020/08/13/large-study-suggests-convalescent-plasma-can-help-treat-covid-19-with-caveats …
Yes. But the main finding presented in the news and in interviews appears not to have been adjusted for - they used the bootstrapping for the concentration of antibodies but I cannot see the same methodology used for the 3 vs >=4 days
-
-
But that's not what the tweet I'm challenging said: "All these authors and no one thought to adjust for age? Or gender? Or one of the many biases that are likely to be present here?"
-
But if the analysis is pivotal to their paper, surely it applies? Perhaps I was a bit overdone, but it's just baffling to me and very frustrating to see!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.