Right. Which brings me back to the question - can you demonstrate that, say, Israel had a higher HCQ use than France? Because if you can't, as I've mentioned, the entire analysis is a waste of time and factually meaningless
And yet, still no actual data on how many people in each country got HCQ. So your 'intervention' and 'control' groups may be entirely wrong and you wouldn't even know As I said, makes the analysis meaningless. Literally. No meaning
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lol. As I said, the evidence you've cited is manifestly inadequate to verify that any country used more/less HCQ. This is a really simple point
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
