This isn't complete perfection, this is simple terminology. It isn't random and using that word is wrong 
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @c19analysis
Nonsense. I have generated randomization schedules myself, it is not hard. You just need prospective enrollment and some method of randomization to make things random, your study simply doesn't do that. You are wrong to use to word, it's very simple
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @c19analysis
No idea why you're linking to that paper, but it has nothing to do with the discussion. Your methodology is not random, you made no attempt to randomize anything, thus the word random is wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @c19analysis
Nonsense. Balancing confounders is not the aim of randomization. I suspect you've misunderstood that paper as well as the word random
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @c19analysis
Nonsense. This is a randomized controlled trial where the use of the word is appropriate https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25064594/ You just have to actually randomize things. Whether you are specific or not, your use of the word is incorrect
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I should add - if you do want to be taken seriously, amending the trial description to "ecological associative trial" is a must. Currently, anyone who has a basic grasp on trial design will probably just instantly dismiss the entire thing because the terminology is wrong
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.