Another seroprevalence study from northern Italy that seems to imply an IFR of 7.4%(!), which is by orders of magnitude the highest I've seenhttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.24.20138875v1 …
-
-
Well sounds like we know everything we need to know about this thing then. I choose the Qatar study because reasons let’s open everything up.
-
With the Qatar IFR, A LOT of areas would have more than 100% infected... it's extremely biased in some ways...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lowest would be probably Kenya, although they based on blood donors. Blood donors likely even underestimate the true prevalence. Kenya gives IFR 0.003% https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.27.20162693v1 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One explanation for this difference is high rates of vitamin D deficiency in Northern Italy:https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.24.20138644v1 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.