This is a really careful, interesting, and thoughtful analysis of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19 and what works (i.e. masks, distancing etc) to control spread A quick review thread 1/nhttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.28.20116129v3 …
-
-
2.5/n This is the list of places Mostly European, with a few other locations around the worldpic.twitter.com/hdD4pFecDI
Show this thread -
3/n The researchers then created two statistical models. The first inferred the reproductive number (Reff) at any point, using the cases/deaths data The second associated Reff with the measures put in place to get an idea of what workspic.twitter.com/layeqYbk3F
Show this thread -
4/n (FYI - my Bayesian stats are a bit rusty, so please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, but that seems like the simplest explanation of what was done here)
Show this thread -
5/n Quick epi reminder - the Reff of a disease is the number of people that each infected person will go on to infect, on average, at any moment in time This is important, because it's what the results were presented in
Show this thread -
6/n So what did the paper find? Here's the main results. The further to the right an intervention is, the better it was at reducing Reff (and thus reducing the spread of COVID-19pic.twitter.com/58PFaenMpy
Show this thread -
7/n To further explain, what this shows is the expected marginal benefit of each intervention So, for example, say you've already cancelled all gatherings over 100. Cancelling gatherings over 10 people will have an additional 36% reduction in the number of new cases
Show this thread -
8/n Two very interesting points: 1. Mask mandates for public spaces had negligible impact on the spread of COVID-19 2. Stay at home orders similarly didn't have much additional benefit
Show this thread -
9/n On the other hand, as the authors note, closing schools and universities appears to have had a disproportionate impact on the spread of COVID-19
Show this thread -
10/n The authors then estimate the interventions required to bring Reff down to 1: - close schools - close universities - close some businesses - limit gatherings to 10 peoplepic.twitter.com/fNpfSmoGuB
Show this thread -
11/n Some strengths of this trial are that they had multiple people rating the interventions and timing, the sample size was reasonably large, and they used a relatively objective outcome (Reff) to track efficacy
Show this thread -
12/n Limitations are a bit more numerous, but two in particular I wanted to highlight: - Hard to dissociate some interventions - Some interventions not includedpic.twitter.com/eov5fAzfpc
Show this thread -
13/n In particular, they found that while mask regulations appeared to have minimal benefit, it was hard to dissociate mask mandates from other interventions, so this might not be indicative of a lack of efficacy
Show this thread -
14/n Indeed, many places only implemented these mandates after other regulations, so it could be that the MARGINAL (i.e. additional) benefit of masks on top of other social distancing regulations was small, but that by themselves the benefits could be largerpic.twitter.com/fMMJ5Bwize
Show this thread -
15/n Now, as ever it is hard to infer causal conclusions from studies like this (correlation=/=causation) BUT This is a careful, well-thought-out attempt to define the benefits associated with each intervention
Show this thread -
16/n For example, I'd say a reasonable conclusion is that the marginal benefit of stay-at-home orders on top of other interventions is probably pretty small Conversely, the benefit associated with closing universities is probably pretty big
Show this thread -
17/n I should also note that I am not an expert in Bayesian statistical methods, so I might've missed something important in terms of limitations of the models used
Show this thread -
18/n Another worthwhile point is that I think that this paper is pretty good, but as with everything I could be wrong Point out any errors I've missed!
Show this thread -
19/n Thread worth reading on some more limitations of the studyhttps://twitter.com/DiseaseEcology/status/1290364813755863041?s=20 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.