It appears John Ioannidis, of "Most Published Research Findings Are False" fame led a group of anti-lockdown scientists to try and influence the White House
In March 

Amazing story by @stephaniemlee
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/ioannidis-trump-white-house-coronavirus-lockdowns …
-
-
And to recap, what John Ioannidis wrote about bias in scientific research himself:pic.twitter.com/uxEUZmChWy
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What’s the science/reason behind why he’s doing this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
is this santa clara study already published or is it still in peer review? cannot find on pubmed.
-
AFAIK it's still in preprint
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It isn't only Ioannidis or Stanford. Take Oxford for example: https://unherd.com/thepost/oxford-epidemiologists-suppression-strategy-is-not-viable/ … I can't help but feeling this is an ideological confrontation, not a scientific one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.