Thanks, can you please share the link to full text?
-
-
-
The preprint is here, although this graph has a few extra studies as well (Louisiana, Norbotten, Arizona)https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089854v4 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
0.69 for all groups? Does the study break down IFR by age group and comorbidity? Link? Many thanks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A high quality study of Rio Grande do Sul actually report 0.23-0.38% IFR, although the total number of deaths in South America is heavily underestimatedhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0992-3 …
-
The data is from May when prevalence was lower and case distribution skewing younger. Cases and deaths in Grande do Sul have more than tripled since the study was updated. See the state dashboard (https://ti.saude.rs.gov.br/covid19/ ) and compare to numbers reported in the paper.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for this - very interesting paper
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems rather over-optimistic to have such tight error bounds. I don't doubt the maths, but I doubt whether it really applies. Seems to me that the realistic error bands are 0.3-1.5%.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you pls post link to your quality assessment form? thx.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.