Why does signal keep showing up? Is it a flaw in analysis? Is it a flaw in the was smoking is reported? Or is there something else to it? I remember looking at the first outcome data from Wuhan and seeing that the smoking rates reported did not support smoking as a risk factor?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps I'm simply an idiot, but shouldn't there be a MULTITUDE of research before definitely CONCLUDING smoking offers "relative protection"? Because that's how Im reading Mr Topol's tweet vs "may possibly depending upon dozens of possible variables".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Is this a collider issue?
-
Very likely: https://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk › ...PDF Why most studies into COVID19 risk factors may be producing flawed conclusions - and how to ...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.