Question: is it standard practice in some fields to have the "methods" section after the results and discussion sections (i.e. tacked onto the end of the paper)? I've just seen it for the first time, wondering if this is common.
Yeh I've seen that done and agree it's the best compromise. Short methods as usual, then a long appendix with the full methodology
-
-
I would love it if we could have layered and embedded publications that were complete and didn't require appendices. E.g. the list of reagents is embedded here (click to expand). Ignorable if you don't need it, easy to find if you do, infinite potential word count.
-
E.g. the code to produce the result figure is in the markdown for the result as one big beautiful sciencey document. I hate appendices and footnotes and works cited lists so very much. (yes, I know eLife exists)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
