Question: is it standard practice in some fields to have the "methods" section after the results and discussion sections (i.e. tacked onto the end of the paper)? I've just seen it for the first time, wondering if this is common.
-
-
Fine, put that detail in the appendix. But the main details of the methods should be before the results. It's not a press release. EVERYTHING relies on the methods. They should be front and centre.
-
Yeh I've seen that done and agree it's the best compromise. Short methods as usual, then a long appendix with the full methodology
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
