27/n Taking all this into account, let's look at the IFRs for only those studies using representative population samples that were correctly calculated
-
-
38/n Another addition, this thread goes through some of the headaches with the paper that have remained through every version TL:DR - it's not systematic! https://twitter.com/AVG_Joseph96/status/1283236273558294528?s=20 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
have you been able to characterize how the IFR changes over time? i think rather than coming up with a single number or range at any point in time, it'd be better to show how it's evolved over time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the paper to look at for IFR estimate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does this range account for the potential for immunity derived from T/B cells? I don't see it mentioned in the paper, and note this range is described as a probable underestimate, leaving me somewhat confused. Apologies if I'm missing something obvious.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.