Because there is no other good way to explain it. Sick person was in fixed positions in room singing, did not touch others. Fomites low likelihood per CDC. How can person spit enough droplets within 1 m if 53 people?
That's not what your argument has been. Your original point was that there's no way to explain these cases except for aerosols (this is the assumption that your paper relies on and the entire argument). That's incorrect, as I've pointed out
-
-
Too few words for Twitter. Still think you can't explain EVENT w/o aerosols. Could explain~ 5 cases, not 53. Just no time for extended close contact - paper makes case for aerosols - Then does calcs w assump of 100% for simplicity. Results similar if assume 80% or 90% or whatever
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
