That's not true, actually. As both the CDC and WHO have pointed out, it is perfectly plausible that fomite and droplet spread could've caused that outbreak
Like I said, this is what you would get if you believe that people are automatons. In fact, it's perfectly reasonable to assume that one garrulous person might talk to everyone there, or that some hands were shaken/hugs exchanged despite the general policy 
-
-
Not saying this is a given, of course, but it's also certainly not impossible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed. But we know who index case was. Details can't be made public (privacy), but we know person didn't do that. Likely mingled less than average - Chance of 2nd index case v low. No cases in county of 130k ppl at the time. Only 7 by time this cluster broke, ~0.005% chance
-
- Why so hard to accept that aerosols may be playing a role, and adopt measures against it as a precaution? - e.g. not certain / controversial that some contaminants cause cancer. Still wise to avoid them if you can.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.