5 um in diameter stay in the air many minutes, and can be inhaled. Which continues to be true up to several tens of microns. Is that what you are calling "droplets that can be inhaled"? Because that's the aerosol pathway we are describing. And those are NOT WHO's droplets (1-2m)
-
-
We can theorise about how the virus might spread - and investigate the most minute of droplets/aerosols in the process - but ultimately if it doesn't match the actual evidence of transmission from contact tracing then I'm not convinced

-
We have investigated the Skagit choir, 1 person gave it to 53 despite limited contact. Nearly impossible to explain except by aerosols. Similar for other superspreading events
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We agree on that. Which points perhaps to larger aerosols that are lost efficiently on HVAC, or high enough dose needed that not achieved after HVAC dilution etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you have good references on this? I can’t find things that I feel are reliable that demonstrate much.
-
Our paper. Happy to answer questionshttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.15.20132027v1 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.