Not at all. As you've repeatedly pointed out, context is key - if you present a letter signed by someone who is currently facing consequences for their political stance, and call for an end to such consequences, it's hardly a long bow to connect the two
-
-
If you haven't been arrested or sexually harassed, you're just being 'held to account': https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/06/stop-firing-innocent/613615/ ….
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suppose the distinction Is that when activists use the term "privilege" they are exclusively speaking in terms of "correcting" perceived social hierarchies based on identity. I care about who has the ability to control and coerce. They are very different political views. /1
-
In particular, if the entire goal of your politics is finding the most vulnerable identity in the room and shifting things for their benefit - a lot of coercive actions are justifiable. After-all, it's all done in the pursuit of "justice".
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.