Only insofar as it's vacuous nonsense. The statements are so general that they could literally apply to anything, then some vague appeal to Trump as an attempt to establish some left-wing creds. It's standard "both sides" absurdity
Given the context, I think it's pretty obvious what getting Rowling to sign a letter calling for an end to censoriousness in society might imply
-
-
That Rowling doesn’t want censoriousness? You’re back to your starting point: that the signatories’ sole concern is themselves.
-
Not at all. As you've repeatedly pointed out, context is key - if you present a letter signed by someone who is currently facing consequences for their political stance, and call for an end to such consequences, it's hardly a long bow to connect the two
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.