I'm not saying it's not having an effect, I'm saying calling this silencing is a ridiculous overreach. It's equating an unfortunate allusion with laws restricting freedom of speech
Dunno, some of the authors seem to agree that the message was not quite as intendedpic.twitter.com/rtn24OHahB
-
-
Isn’t her objection - and maybe yours? - to Rowling’s signature, not the message itself?
-
Pretty sure that the signatories to a letter somewhat define its message. Not saying that's the only issue, but given the timing it certainly gave the letter a very strong meaning
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.