Hot off the presses: updated systematic review and meta analysis of COVID-19 IFR up on Medrxiv What's new: - bias rating for serology studies - discussion about limitations of serology - new studies includedhttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089854v4 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
Atomsk's Sanakan Retweeted Health Nerd
Many studies weren't included, + u gave good explanations for why. I'm just wondering which of those explanations applies to Bergamo. I ask b/c it's one of only 2 places I know of with a real chance of herd immunity now https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1276108131014258690 …https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1270273158839336960 …
Atomsk's Sanakan added,
Health NerdVerified account @GidMKNew serosurvey results for Bergamo means a new IFR Taking the official death toll of ~3200, 57% of 1.1million inhabitants puts the IFR at ~0.52% Taking the deaths estimated from excess mortality of ~6,200, the IFR would be ~1% https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1270125963616161806 …Show this thread1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Replying to @AtomsksSanakan
Can't find any decent information on the sample. Some sources say it was selected (I.e. hospital workers given precedence) which we've excluded in the criteria
2:17 AM - 8 Jul 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.