Interesting point from the risk of bias rating - it appears that serology studies with a lower risk of bias produce a higher IFRpic.twitter.com/mxBHBjM4yK
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Interesting point from the risk of bias rating - it appears that serology studies with a lower risk of bias produce a higher IFRpic.twitter.com/mxBHBjM4yK
Many studies weren't included, + u gave good explanations for why. I'm just wondering which of those explanations applies to Bergamo. I ask b/c it's one of only 2 places I know of with a real chance of herd immunity now https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1276108131014258690 …https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1270273158839336960 …
Can't find any decent information on the sample. Some sources say it was selected (I.e. hospital workers given precedence) which we've excluded in the criteria
I feel like I'm missing something. The graphic you share states an IFR of .60, but the linked article says .68.
Overall IFR was .68, if you only looked at serological studies it was .6
This is a nice work, however I am perplexed by the fact different countries have different ways of reporting covid-19 cases and deaths and truly wonder if we can really calculate a really representative global IFR (ignoring age stratification) for Sars-cov-2.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.