The blog post. Have a look at some of the other work on there
-
-
I suppose if I invent something and someone gives me royalties that means I'll be a lousy editor.
-
Regardless, I've got no idea what the point of a paper like this is. Are they implying that editors are on the take by industry? If so, prove it with actual research about what and how the journal publishes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I also think that these numbers are themselves skewed substantially. For example, the study reports that the median of endocrinology payments is $7,207, but this is only true if you exclude all non-eligible journal editors. For endo, that makes up 11/35 excluded!
-
These people are excluded because they are not eligible for Open Payments reporting, which for some is because they are overseas, but for others is because they are not clinical. That's a pretty enormous issue, because you can't reasonably exclude everyone
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.