There is a paper that does a much more thorough job with much more data, but has been largely ignored thus farhttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.22.20109231v2 …
For example, most deaths in China happened in Wuhan/Hubei, but they've reportedly used the nationwide statistics for most variables. That's an issue, because Wuhan may not be representative of the whole country!
-
-
Oh, also I don't think the duration of mask wearing variable makes sense even if it's calculated correctly. This will skew by definition towards Asian countries that experienced their outbreaks early (and thus have longer 'durations') but will tell us nothing about masks
-
Asian countries represented well among early countries (>50 days before Apr 16). But also many early outbreak countries in Europe, and the mid-East, Africa, and the Americas also represented.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.