2/n a couple of very nice threads looking at the issue: https://twitter.com/NoahHaber/status/1271518754627678208?s=20 … https://twitter.com/KateGrabowski/status/1271542361244352514?s=20 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
3/n On top of these, I wanted to note a couple of other things that make this study obviously wrong in terms of design and conclusions
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
4/n The study is here https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/06/10/2009637117 … Basically, the authors compared the rate of infections before/after mask interventions in three places to a linear trend extrapolation, and found that after masks there were fewer infections than before
1 reply 1 retweet 1 likeShow this thread -
5/n They also plotted linear regressions of pre-mask and post-mask interventions, showing a linear trend upwards and then downwards Thus, masks caused the change!pic.twitter.com/FsshjCPfTH
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
6/n Now, this is at face value implausible. The authors have picked out masks as an intervention, but the reality here is that there was NO SINGLE INTERVENTION that you could easily point to at any moment in time
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
7/n In New York, in the same week that the governor signed a mask law, there were at least 2 other laws implemented regarding COVID-19, and many changes in policy as well It's not as simple as a single intervention!
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
8/n Moreover, the authors have cherry-picked 3 specific places that appear to support their argument This is obviously bad science - what about the rest of the world?
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
9/n What about Australia, where we've never had mask laws (and most people don't wear masks)?pic.twitter.com/CfulD3MWkq
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
10/n Or South Korea, where masks have always been a major part of the pandemic response? Both of these are direct counter-examples to the arguments made in the piece, but are excludedpic.twitter.com/ESNAGvHb4C
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
11/n There are dozens more such examples. While in some countries masking was temporally related to declines in case numbers, this is by no means true of every place in the world
1 reply 1 retweet 1 likeShow this thread
12/n So the authors have cherry-picked their interventions, cherry-picked their locations, and as others have identified done quite a few other questionable things as well It is ~very~ frustrating to see
-
-
13/n Especially since I am not against masks! The point here is not that masks do or do not work, it is that this paper provides absolutely no evidence either way and is largely useless at determining cause and effect
3 replies 4 retweets 25 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.