Broadly speaking, it is a defense of John Ioannidis, who has come under fire for some academic decisions that many feel are a bit questionable
-
-
Presenting this whole debacle as "just asking questions" or as some kind of vague academic dispute about correctness is, imo, really missing the point
Show this thread -
And the piece ends with this, which is, uh, an odd thing to say How in the world can you describe what is happening as 'silencing'???pic.twitter.com/gRAicWKAEB
Show this thread -
Ioannidis has, by my count, appeared on more than a dozen national US TV shows, had a Youtube video with millions of hits, has been in print another dozen times, and has written two lengthy editorials If that's silencing, sign me up
Show this thread -
Overall, I think the piece is very misleading, and as I've pointed out factually incorrect in several aspects
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. Which countries policies were impacted by SC?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.