23/n There's also no reasoning given for including multiple different outcomes from the SAME PATIENTS in a meta-analysis This is very concerning
-
-
34/n In summation, the paper: - inadequately rates risk of bias - inappropriately combines estimates... - ...that may have been miscalculated It is hard to know what to make of this, except to say that the paper itself is not very useful in any way
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you take a look at the journal you will see that half of the editorial board, including the editor-in-chief, is part of his team/institute.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.