I would do another rapid peer-review by twitter here, but honestly it's such a garbage fire of a paper that I can't see the point?https://twitter.com/MicrobiomDigest/status/1270146784652693505 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Search strategy, inclusion/exclusion, and pretty much the whole review methodology were opaque and/or non-existent Major studies were completely overlooked in favor of the authors' own work
Also, it's a fairly major publication for the journal, and there are clearly many language issues/mistranslations. Not a great look
Agreed. They appear to have basically decided that research that they didn't like was "Big Data" and then derided it as Very Bad
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.