I would do another rapid peer-review by twitter here, but honestly it's such a garbage fire of a paper that I can't see the point?https://twitter.com/MicrobiomDigest/status/1270146784652693505 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There was no meaningful distinction between Big Data and/or real world, and the disconnect made no sense. The papers they liked appear multiple times in the analysis, but the ones they disliked only get a single line (for no reason)
Search strategy, inclusion/exclusion, and pretty much the whole review methodology were opaque and/or non-existent Major studies were completely overlooked in favor of the authors' own work
Also, it's a fairly major publication for the journal, and there are clearly many language issues/mistranslations. Not a great look
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.