That doesn't appear to be true - looks like it's varying a bit but ~4% for some time
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PostAp0calyptik
Of course it's a metric. So is number of tests. The two are related, but both give you important information
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @AbramRacin
Given the trend in case numbers, that projection is almost certainly wrong. With a median lag of ~21 days from infection to death, we'd expect deaths to keep declining for the next fortnight then increase quickly after
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PostAp0calyptik @AbramRacin
Hmm? The mean testing numbers have gone up, what, 5%? 10%? The percent positive is almost e account the same (except for 6/6) based on that screencap. Looks like the testing has barely increased while case numbers have soared
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PostAp0calyptik @AbramRacin
Lol, you've got them on the same graph so of course not. If you look closely, because of how the bars are formatted 888 new cases looks like more than 2.5k
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Oh, I agree that there's no trend for the percent positive. Seems very steady over time
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.