That doesn't appear to be true - looks like it's varying a bit but ~4% for some time
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PostAp0calyptik
Of course it's a metric. So is number of tests. The two are related, but both give you important information
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @AbramRacin
Given the trend in case numbers, that projection is almost certainly wrong. With a median lag of ~21 days from infection to death, we'd expect deaths to keep declining for the next fortnight then increase quickly after
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PostAp0calyptik @AbramRacin
Hmm? The mean testing numbers have gone up, what, 5%? 10%? The percent positive is almost e account the same (except for 6/6) based on that screencap. Looks like the testing has barely increased while case numbers have soared
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @AbramRacin
Lol so which source are we talking about here? That one is very uninformative because you've got all three on the same graph, basically impossible to interpret
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
To be fair, given how totally useless the IHME modelling has generally been I'm not sure that I trust it anyway 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.