That's not really what the Wuhan data shows (risk of community transmission =/= prevalence), and we have a fair bit of data behind the expectation that HC workers would be at increased risk. It's also not the only reason that I've given for the IFR to be a likely underestimate
Lol, you can check the cached version if you want. It says right at the top when it was last updated
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They have. The initial posited IFR was 0.1-0.2% (back in March). It's been updated several times since then, as new evidence from seroprevalence studies have come out.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.