So given that, the low proportion positive, and the bias in testing, the point estimate for prevalence is probably a significant overestimate and therefore the IFR is likely quite a bit higher in Florida
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well, the Miami-Dade seroprevalence estimate was reportedly random, but their test specificity was worryingly low (~90%), which means that the confidence interval for prevalence in the county would include 0% (and therefore the IFR CI would include the CFR)pic.twitter.com/NDPUvcteTy
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The study quality isn't impacted by age breakdown. As I said, you would expect the value to vary somewhat by population. For example London (IFR ~0.5%) is lower than England (~0.8%) probably due in part to the younger age
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.