Let's hope that sets a standard for the future?
-
-
-
We can only hope
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How many are never retracted because they don’t have such publicity but still stealthily influence daily practice. This is an epidemic in medical sciences.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
All I can say is if you're interested in scientific accuracy I have a whole blog on it
End of conversation
-
-
-
Political interference? If so, let's not help them discredit science more but point in their direction & demand arm's length from both vested interests & politics. (My children have autism so I am acutely aware of the consequences of fraud, misinformation, conspiracy theories.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m shocked that the incompetent editor of the Lancet who took 10’years to withdraw the Wakefield paper,managed to pull his finger out so quickly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.