Another update, now with the ONS figures from England Doesn't change the point estimate overall, but moves the serology-specific estimate up to 0.59% (0.42-0.75%) https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1267683223712104450 …pic.twitter.com/gAVVNjDkeG
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Since it's random-effects model , the weighting is mostly about confidence interval. The bendavid study estimates their CI as very narrow, whereas the Spanish study had a wider bound. You're not wrong about the error rates, we discuss that in the paper a bit
Ah, thanks.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.