@MaxCRoser check this out.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your x-axis hurts my feelings.
-
...as intended
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I find it weird that the Spanish huge serology study is weighted less than the small, problematic Bendavid study. Also in the general case, low prevalence is close to tests' error rates, so not very reliable (false positives lower IFR).
-
Since it's random-effects model , the weighting is mostly about confidence interval. The bendavid study estimates their CI as very narrow, whereas the Spanish study had a wider bound. You're not wrong about the error rates, we discuss that in the paper a bit
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.