As ever, if you see an IFR estimate or a serology study, send it my way!
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Removed” “CEBM” Blocked!!
-
I told one of my students to go and read your papers yesterday. On exercise. Not Covid. I just thought I'd tell you as I saw your name pop up.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hi Gid, how might I reference these data? Are they published anywhere?
-
Best reference is the preprint, not quite as updated as this graph but essentially the same numbershttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089854v3 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.16.20132423v1 … Large seroprevalence study in Wuhan, 3.33% seropositive, IFR would be around 1.05%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you tracking which papers account for age distributions?
-
Many of the serosurveys report age breakdown of infections, but it's been getting deaths by age AND infections by age that's the problem. Thus far, only Swiss data has done so
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.