To put it another way: Roses are red, Violets are green, The placebo effect is mostly just regression to the mean
-
-
Show this thread
-
Lots of people asking, so here's the basic explanation. For subjective outcomes (i.e. pain) there's some evidence that placebos have a benefit. However, this is problematic because it could be due to reporting bias
Show this thread -
This means that people could be reporting that they think they've improved when, objectively, they haven't Which is exactly what we see when we look at objective outcomes
Show this thread -
So, for example, you might find that people with hypertension report feeling better after taking a placebo, but they don't actually have lower blood pressure
Show this thread -
Or people may report a reduction in pain, but they don't take fewer pain relief medications despite the placebo subjectively improving their response
Show this thread -
This is all summarized very well in a 2001 systematic review in NEJMhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200105243442106 …
Show this thread -
Many of the claimed benefits to the placebo effect (blue pills work TWICE as well as red!) are based on surprisingly terrible research from decades ago If you want to know more, I strongly recommend listening to
@mikehall314 on Skeptics With A K, very comprehensive reviewsShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Omg, for real?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I prefer the half of studies that demonstrate the benefits of a placebo, they put my mind at ease.
-
Particularly the blue ones
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.