If you consider yourself apolitical after studying epidemiology, you've missed some of the key points and should have another look at the subject #epitwitterhttps://twitter.com/zclayborne/status/1267156066795761664 …
-
-
It’s not boring. It’s true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everyone wants to improve society. Epidemiologists’ views about how to do that are no better than anyone else’s.
-
"Better" is a moral judgement, so obviously you're right - it's inherently subjective Better informed, however, is a more reasonable point, and I think very defensible
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You see this with MHPs too. Yay for manualized therapies and theories of behavior change but as soon as you practice get ready to talk all day about racism, religion, and the crushing traumas inflicted by the state
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
genetics are also unequal not racist epidemiology the honest fact is life is not always fair no matter what you try to do
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it's important to note the two conflicting uses of "political" in everyday speech. Science shows up all those inconvenient realities that demand political action. Science does not, and should not, start by assuming a particular ideology and twisting facts to fit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.