Thanks to @hildabast, who gave such detailed and helpful critique
We haven't adopted everything (I think it's fair to include the CEBM estimate
) but I think we answered most of the questions!https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1265755135226986499 …
Hmmm true. I'll talk to my co-author but I think it's a good point. Probably will exclude in the next update, thanks!
-
-
You need to talk to someone with more specialist methodological expertise in systematic reviews & meta-analysis, incl about whether meta-analysis is indicated at all. You need to address the point, for which CEBM was just 1 example: how often are Wuhan data counted, for example?
-
Well there were two studies that used Wuhan data, but they were very different datasets (deaths/cases and serology two months apart). Another study inferred IFR from Beijing, and another used exported cases from China as a whole
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.