Thanks to @hildabast, who gave such detailed and helpful critique
We haven't adopted everything (I think it's fair to include the CEBM estimate
) but I think we answered most of the questions!https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1265755135226986499 …
Definitely, but the main issue was about how to classify it. I'm not sure it's fair to call the estimate a blog post, it's an expert review published on a university website - in this case, my initial thinking was that it is grey literature
-
-
Fair enough - doesn't solve the original problem I was raising it for: double(triple &c) counting.
-
Ah but I don't think it is double-counting, because the actual IFR estimate that they produce is not a statistical aggregate - it's just their expert opinion
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.