Apologies for the delay in updating the systematic review/meta-analysis, we've had some actually good criticisms received so we're trying to incorporate those into the newest version
-
Show this thread
-
It's fascinating how many people just told me that I was a PhD candidate (true) and therefore the study was worthless (less true) The very few actual critiques have been far more useful, and I think will make the research much stronger
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Very interesting thanks! A very selected population, but so were the other studies in this area, interesting that these results diverge so starkly
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes I've seen the Valenti one, it's a great paper!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
True, but it's definitely a very unexpected finding given the Santa Clara and LA County studies. Makes me wonder if selection bias was an even bigger issue in those studies than has been reported
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I think the time periods would overlap, but yes a week or two earlier at the start. As you say, it's a bit astonishing - 10-20 fold difference in prevalence estimates for early April
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.