Fantastic work, I admire your commitment
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Consistent with Verity et al. 0.66%
-
Indeed. I think that paper was impressively prescient and robust
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for updating this was hoping it would rise to the top of the inbox sometime soon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For comparison, what's the IFR for flu? Thank you for all your posts.
-
Much much lower.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Did you also break it down by age group? What is your best IFR estimate for 18-45?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, well, thats the scientific-metaanalysis giving the latest confidence intervals. So, by now, what we know: 0,53% < IFR(covid19) < 0,9% with a most probable value of ~0,7% (with appropriate care in place)
-
So, I happily correct my former lower limit from 0,6% down to 0,53% (it wsn't that far away and still lower than the most probable value).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.