A lot of antibody surveillance results coming out at the moment, which gives us a chance to think about the fatality rate of #COVID19
But, there's a catch. Let's talk about right-censoring and why it's important 
-
-
That's right-censoring in a nutshell If you stop counting results too early, suddenly your study has a significant bias (often towards low/no difference)
Show this thread -
What does this mean to antibody results for COVID-19? Well, think about how these studies are conducted. We test a bunch of people randomly on day x to get an idea of how many people are immune to COVID-19 on that day
Show this thread -
Then, to calculate mortality, most people take the number of deaths on day x and divide by the denominator implied by the results
Show this thread -
So, if we think 4% of 100,000 people have had COVID-19, and 10 of them have died on day x, we'd say that the infection-fatality rate is 10/4000 = 0.025%
Show this thread -
BUT there's an issue here People don't die from COVID-19 immediately. It usually takes somewhere between 15-20 days from when they get infected The data is right-censored!
Show this thread -
There are probably a bunch of people who HAVE the disease on day x who are counted in our sample and will die but haven't yet!
Show this thread -
So, what we SHOULD do in cases like these is either: a) use a statistical model to account for this issue b) wait a few weeks and use different death estimates to correct for potential right-censoring
Show this thread -
Instead, most people just take the proportion immune on day x and divide by deaths on the same day This will almost certainly underestimate the 'true' infection-fatality rate, and is a big worry
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.