At least once a day I remember how much I hate the absurdly low word limits in health-related journals. 3,500 (or in today's case, 4,000) is not enough words, and only serves to convey incomplete and misinformative-by-oversimplification publications.
-
-
The issue is, as I see it, that introduction and discussion are given far greater emphasis by most journals than methodology. We should care more about what people have DONE not what they think is important about those results
-
Agree with your latter absolutely, not so much the former. This may be the problem: 3,500 words is for "communication" to non-researcher decision-makers. But the vast majority of papers aren't even remotely of sufficient quality to be communicated to those decision-makers.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do you know if there is any good data or insight regarding the use/trials of hydroxychloroquine for COVID? I have friends messaging me random doctors who are praising its use for COVID patients.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.