2/13 The idea with airborne diseases is that they are far more infectious than non-airborne ones because people often catch the disease with only minimal or even no direct contact with infected people
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/13 There have been cases of measles demonstrating that a level of virus high enough to be infectious can stay in a room up to ~75 minutes after the person who is sick has leftpic.twitter.com/LU1UXS8kny
Show this thread -
4/13 And we know, from every investigation so far, that COVID-19 simply isn't infectious enough for this to be the MAIN route of infection Measles, for example, is roughly 6x as infectious as COVID-19. Mumps is 4x
Show this thread -
5/13 It's most likely that MOST COVID-19 infections are caused by close-range droplets - a sick person coughs or sneezes (or talks) and contaminates you or a surface which you then touch (called "fomites")pic.twitter.com/5pBsVTPSKO
Show this thread -
6/13 All of this has been known for some time, and is where, for example, the 1.5-2 metre spacing rules come from
Show this thread -
7/13 Does this make the question about airborne spread entirely obsolete? Not quite There's still the pesky outliers to deal with
Show this thread -
8/13 As I said, MOST infections are clearly not airborne But, we've also seen evidence that there is probably SOME level of airborne transmission - rare, perhaps, but it may happen For the sake of argument, let's say it's 1% of infections
Show this thread -
9/13 Think about it - if everyone's social distancing properly then MOST infections - all of the short-range ones - will be prevented We've seen this happen all over the world But the 1% may not be reduced nearly as much by these measures
Show this thread -
10/13 Thing is, that last 1% is also the hardest to get at. It requires even further investments - not just universal masking, but revising aircon, making long-lasting changes to office structures etc It's quite hard to prevent us breathing the same air
Show this thread -
11/13 And we don't NEED to prevent these infections (we might WANT to) To stop the epidemic, the key is to reduce Reff below 1, and we have seen that this is eminently possible using social distancing, testing, contact tracing, and other measurespic.twitter.com/H8CKGkHQQX
Show this thread -
12/13 The marginal benefit to eliminating the possibility of ANY airborne spread is small, but the cost is big Which is why even though there may be the occasional airborne case, it's not a huge issue for most governments and agencies
Show this thread -
13/13 So yes, there may be SOME cases caused by viral particles in the air We may eventually have definitive evidence that it is possible and has happened But it remains unlikely that it has or will play a significant role in the pandemicpic.twitter.com/JMofs9z8By
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.