If they instead had a bit more infected people now and going forward then a possible outbreak in the fall wouldn't get as bad and they could have possibly made it trough without new restrictions then But I'm just guessing here. Trying to read things from the text not stated etc
Herd immunity implies immunity - I.e. a population sufficiently immune to prevent disease outbreaks. Short of that, you're looking at a potential reduction in R0 but that's not 'immunity' per se 
-
-
Fair to say the strategy is "reduction in R by partial herd immunity"? Compared to some other countries that "reduce all cases to the greatest extent at all times".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. The swedish strategy is not to reach herd immunity. It's to get R0 down as much as possible so that our hospitals can cope while still doing something that's sustainable for a very long time
-
And for Finland, is "we have too slow spread" compatible with "get R0 down as much as possible"?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.