As long as we are clear, this means you are happy if some bright junior folks with important but unexpected findings decide to cast aside their findings out of fear of the pitchfork-wielding mobs? I, for one, am not.https://twitter.com/thebirdmaniac/status/1256031461066584064 …
-
-
Replying to @venkmurthy
That's a weird thing to say. Junior folks with important but unexpected findings are often censured not by mobs but by the structure of academia (
@hertzpodcast has some chilling examples)2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
On the other hand, I don't think you can argue that the Santa Clara study has had anything but the most enormous worldwide response of virtually any piece of research for the last 3 months
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @hertzpodcast
No. The ICL reports have been vastly more influential than the Santa Clara study. It isn't even close.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @venkmurthy @hertzpodcast
Altmetric of 19,981 and it isn't even published yet. There are more impactful studies, but that's an enormous reach
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @hertzpodcast
At least part of that is Streisand effect... But point taken.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
That said, the ICL report was singularly influential in changing policy in many nations.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
This is also true, but I had serious reservations (which I expressed at the time) about that report as well. Not sure what the point you're trying to make is? ICL was very influential, but so is the Santa Clara study
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.