Interesting meta-analysis of current papers. Results estimate IFR at 0.79% (0.53%-1.05%). I personally wouldn't have included the Bendavid et al. Santa Clara study (biased sampling and bad maths) but it still shows that the THL 0.1 to 0.2 IFR is not supported by data or modeling.https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1254971248628531200 …
-
-
Thanks for the info. Interesting to see that the estimate you end up with looks like it's robust to outliers in a way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.