The overall figure, based on 13 published estimates from a bunch of different places, is 0.79% (0.53-1.05%), which is actually a bit higher than I was expecting
-
-
Show this thread
-
Note: this is very much a LIVING DOCUMENT I may have made mistakes. I probably have. Point them out and let's work on better estimates together
Show this thread -
And thanks to
@jamesheathers, who suggested this excellent planShow this thread -
Also, worth noting that this isn't a brilliant estimate because there aren't that many studies and they are VERY heterogeneous Ideally I'd like to stratify by age and region, but that's gonna take more data!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some people get to have all the fun

-
Instead of a puppy, I have spreadsheets

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm very worried about how many people will have long term complications resulting from infection

-
Is there a centralized place with information about this? The anecdotes are scary, but that is to be expected. I’m curious to read something more rigorous on the secondary effect. Though I understand it’s still very very early.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I included the CEBM estimate in my figure - I simply aggregated estimates in a statistical model from different placespic.twitter.com/AlolAgQ3qL
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.