So today the former dean of Harvard Medical School wrote an OpEd in a leading health publication about I'm "silencing" an endowed chair at Stanford Medical School by opining on twitter that his latest work is bullshit. How's your day going?
-
-
And quite frankly, the fact that the man has been at the forefront of scientific critique for more than a decade and then put his name on research that makes incredibly inappropriate inferences is worth a pointed remark or two I think
-
I am cool with pointed remarks: "Man that paper stinks bad. Can't believe John put his name on it." People have characterized him as a murderer, demanded his entire team be sacked, a liar with no redeeming value, etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which of his numbers have which value; are there 50 positives, or 50 false positives?
@hkibakThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is he going on TV with a known defender of white supremacists anyway?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually, one key critique is that the numbers ARE valueless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.